Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rieker Inc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rieker Inc[edit]

Rieker Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

User:Bearian, User:James500

Does not appear to meet WP:NOTABILITY and remains with no reliable sources after 8 years Boleyn (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I seconded the Prod and must agree with the nom. I did a couple of quick searches online, and found nothing reliable and significant, just lots of social media, blogs, and directories -- Zero news ghits. This fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Ding me if you find anything. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I am finding nothing more than a couple of pieces of routine description of products by the company. Unless something better can be located, this fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.